An amazing selection of resources of Law and Religious Studies. Suitable for KS3, KS4 and KS5.
All our resources are created with love and care, we take pride in ensuring that they are beautiful to look at, because how are we expected to learn if things aren't pretty?
An amazing selection of resources of Law and Religious Studies. Suitable for KS3, KS4 and KS5.
All our resources are created with love and care, we take pride in ensuring that they are beautiful to look at, because how are we expected to learn if things aren't pretty?
This flow chart is designed to help support students in structuring their essays in contract law.
It gives them an overview of questions to ask that they can then work through in order to identify the relevant issues in the problem question.
It does not cover every single question that an be asked and each area will require more detailed additional steps (such as five steps to establish economic duress) but can be helpful in giving them a rough idea of structure.
It can be printed in A3 although the text is a little small and it would benefit from being printed higher. However, the PDF is high quality so can easily be read and worked from on a screen.
This crib sheet is designed to support students when they are studying the defence of consent in criminal law.
The sheet can be used as a revision resource, a homework activity or as a way to support students making notes in class.
The sheet looks great printed in colour but also prints fine in black and white.
Boxes to complete:
Implied Consent
True Consent
Exceptions
This crib sheet is designed to help support students as they are studying the offer part of formation as part of formation.
This is a great resource to help students make notes in class, support revision or as a homework task.
This looks great printed in colour but also prints fine in black and white.
It has the following boxes to complete:
Five rules of offer
Types of invitation to treat
Termination of offer
This crib sheet is designed to help support students who are studying Eduqas A-Level Law. It focuses on duress which is part of necessity defences and the criminal law unit.
The crib sheet is a great revision resource, support for in class notes or a homework activity.
It looks great printed in colour but also prints fine in black and white.
Boxes to include:
Immediacy
Causal Nexus
Duress of Circumstances
R v Howe (1986)
Voluntary Association with a Criminal Gang
This crib sheet is designed to help support students whilst studying the necessity defence of self-defence as part of the criminal law unit.
It can be used as a homework task, revision task or as a way to support note making in lessons.
It looks great printed in colour but also prints fine in black and white.
Boxes to complete:
Necessity
Proportionate
Mistaken Belief
This crib sheet is designed to support students when they are studying the necessity defence of necessity as part of the Eduqas criminal law unit.
This sheet can be used as a homework task, revision activity or as a way to support students making notes in class.
The sheet looks great printed in colour but also prints fine in black and white.
Boxes to complete are:
Five questions to ask
Re A (Conjoined Twins)
Dudley & Stevens
This crib sheet is designed to help support students who are studying the defence of mistake under criminal law.
This sheet makes a good revision resource, can be used to support notes in class or be assigned as a homework task.
It looks great printed in colour but also prints fine in black and white.
Boxes to complete:
R v Tolson (1889)
Mistake and Intoxication
This mock exam is designed to be given to Year 12 in the Summer of their first year once they have finished their Tort Law module. It is a combination of Paper 2 and Paper 3 style questions.
Paper: Paper 2 & 3 (combined)
Exam Board: Eduqas
Unit: Tort Law
Time Allowed: 2 hours 15 minutes
Questions: 6x 25 marks (students answer 3)
This paper is designed to be given to Year 12 students at the end of their tort law module. Because students have not studied all three units it combines paper 2 and paper 3 into one paper. This should help to replicate timings well as it is the same length and same number of questions as both Paper 2 and Paper 3.
Students answer three questions, each one is a choice of two.
Section A: Scenario (Problem) Questions (Paper 2)
Section B: Evaluation Questions (Paper 3)
Section C: 1x Scenario & 1x Evaluation Question (Paper 2 & Paper 3)
Students answer one question from each section.
Question Topics
Question 1 (Scenario): Nuisance & Trespass
Question 2 (Scenario): Negligence (inc. economic loss)
Question 3 (Evaluation): Negligence
Question 4 (Evaluation): Occupier’s Liability
Question 5 (Scenario): Rylands v Fletcher, Nuisance & Trespass
Question 6 (Evaluation): Psychiatric Injury
Students should be given 2 hours 15 minutes to answer the paper.
Students will also need lined paper/answer booklets.
This mock exam is designed to replicate Paper 1 for the Eduqas A-Level Law syllabus. It is suitable for Year 12 or Year 13 mock exams.
Paper: Paper 1
Exam Board: Eduqas
Paper Length: 1 Hour 30 Minutes
Unit: English Legal Systems
Students should be given 1 hour 30 minutes to complete this paper. They will also need lined paper/answer booklets to write their answers in.
This is a complete paper, students will need to have studied all of the English Legal Systems (including Sources of Law) unit in order to complete this paper.
Suitable for both January & June mock exams in Year 12 and January mocks in Year 13.
Questions
Question 1 (5 marks): Precedent
Question 2 (5 marks): Delegated Legislation
Question 3 (15 marks): Law Reform
Question 4 (15 marks): Statutory Interpretation
Question 5:
(a - 10 marks): Civil appeals
(b - 15 marks): Woolf Reforms
Question 6:
(a - 10 marks): Magistrates
(b - 15 marks): Magistrates
Students have to answer:
2x 5 marks
1x 15 mark (sources of law)
1x 10/15 mark combination
Essay Topic: Nuisance
Specification: Eduqas
Marks: 25
This is a 25 mark scenario style essay on nuisance. This is designed for the Eduqas A-Level Law specification, Substantive Law in Practice paper.
Included is a model answer that can be handed to students as well as a model plan that is very useful for marking.
This question can easily be adapted to an AQA 30 Marker Scenario Question
Updated February 2023 in light of the decision in Fearn v Tate Gallery
Essay Topic: Vicarious Liability (Negligence)
Specification: Eduqas
Marks: 25
This is a 25 mark scenario style essay on vicarious liability. This is designed for the Eduqas A-Level Law specification, Substantive Law in Practice paper.
Included is a model answer that can be handed to students as well as a model plan that is very useful for marking.
This question can easily be adapted to an AQA 30 Marker Scenario Question
Updated February 2023 to include decisions in Barclays, Christian Brothers and Mohamud
This is a past paper AQA theory of law style question with a model answer and plan.
This question looks at law and society and the connection between the Consumer Rights Act 2015 and freedom of contract.
This is a 15 mark Nature of Law style question from the AQA examination.
Included is a model answer and plan which can be used to help support marking.
Exam Board: AQA
Unit: Nature of Law
Topic: Law and Society (Contract Law)
Marks: 15
This is a nature of law style 15 mark question for the AQA A-Level Exam in law.
This question focuses on contract law with reference to the law and society unit.
Included is the question to be given to students as well as a model plan and model answer to assist with marking/DIRT.
Exam Board: AQA
Unit: Nature of Law
Topic: Law and Justice (Criminal Law)
Marks: 15
This is a nature of law style 15 mark question for the AQA A-Level Exam in law.
This question focuses on criminal law with reference to the law and justice unit.
Included is the question to be given to students as well as a model plan and model answer to assist with marking/DIRT.
Exam Board: AQA
Unit: Nature of Law
Topic: Law and Morality (Tort Law)
Marks: 15
This is a nature of law style 15 mark question for the AQA A-Level Exam in law.
This question focuses on tort law with reference to the law and morality unit.
Included is the question to be given to students as well as a model plan and model answer to assist with marking/DIRT.
This worksheet contains 20 individual practice questions designed for year 13 law students.
These questions can be set as revision activities or homework activities. They are also a useful back-up in case cover is needed for a particular lesson.
These questions are all Eduqas style exam questions, although the scenario questions could be modified for other exam boards.
Question topics:
Statutory interpretation (5 marks)
Law Commission (5 marks)
Delegated legislation (15 marks)
Judicial precedent (15 marks)
Alternative dispute resolution (10 marks)
Criminal trial process (10 marks)
Magistrates (15 marks)
Legal funding (15 marks)
Vicarious liability (scenario)
Defences and remedies (scenario)
Negligence (evaluation)
Nuisance (evaluation)
Necessity defences (scenario)
Murder (scenario)
Elements of criminal liability (evaluation)
Voluntary manslaughter (evaluation)
Misrepresentation (scenario)
Formation (scenario)
Express terms (evaluation)
Implied terms (evaluation)
The document includes instructions to pick five questions out of the sheet and plan them but this can easily be modified.
This worksheet is designed for year 12 students who have studied all of the English Legal Systems unit and the start of tort law. They need to understand all elements of negligence and also vicarious liability.
The worksheet contains a variety of questions which students can plan as part of a homework activity, revision activity or as last minute cover work if a staff member is absent.
The sheet has instructions stating to choose five questions to complete (standard cover lesson) but this can easily be modified to suit.
Included essays:
Separation of powers (5 marks)
Delegated legislation (5 marks)
Statutory interpretation (15 marks)
Law Making (15 marks)
Criminal trial process (10 marks)
Legal funding (10 marks)
Criminal appeals (15 marks)
Civil process (15 marks)
Negligence (scenario)
Negligence + Res Ipsa Loquitur (scenario)
Vicarious liability (evaluation)
Economic loss (evaluation)
Topic: Occupiers’ Liability (1957 & 1984)
Exam Board: Eduqas
Paper: Paper 2 & 3
This case table contains the must know cases and statute section for occupiers’ liability. These are the ones that will appear in every scenario question for occupiers’ liability and are the ones all students will have to know.
The two key cases are:
Addie v Dumbreck (1929)
Wheat v Lacon (1966)
The four key sections are:
Occupiers’ Liability Act 1957, s 1(1)
Occupiers’ Liability Act 1957, s 1(3)(a)
Occupiers’ Liability Act 1957, s 2(2)
Occupiers’ Liability Act 1984, s 1(3)
There is space to fill in the facts and ratio for the cases and the law for the statutes.
Students can complete this as a starter activity as part of a revision lesson or as a homework task.
I get students to complete as much as they can from memory and then complete the tables with notes as part of revision.
Topic: Delegated Legislation
Unit: Sources of Law (English Legal Systems)
Exam Board: Eduqas
Paper: Paper 1
This table contains the three cases students must known for delegated legislation. These are the cases that will appear in every 15 mark application answer.
Students have spaces to fill in the facts and ratio decidendi for each case.
The cases are:
Agricultural Training Board v Aylesbury Mushrooms (1972)
Associated Provincial Picture Houses Ltd v Wednesbury Corporation (1948)
R v Home Secretary, ex parte Fire Brigades Union (1995)
This can be used as a starter in a revision lesson or as a homework activity.
I get students to fill in as much as they can without their notes first and then use their notes to complete the table.
Topic: Misrepresentation
Unit: Contract Law
Exam Board: Eduqas
Paper: Paper 2 & 3
This case table contains the key cases that students must know for misrepresentation. These are the cases that will appear in every scenario question for misrepresentation.
Students have spaces to fill in the facts of the case and the ratio decidendi
Cases included are:
Attwood v Small (1868)
Derry v Peek (1889)
Hedley Byrne v Heller (1963)
Peek v Gurney (1873)
Roscorla v Thomas (1842)
The sheet can be used as a starter for a revision lesson or a homework activity.
I get students to fill in as much as they can without their notes and then use their notes to complete it.